Is Pushing Really for Suckers?
Thursday, August 7th, 2008By Glinda

I’m going to do something I’m probably going to regret and jump into the Caesarean Section vs. Natural Childbirth debate.
First, I’m going to say that I’m not for scheduling C-sections because it’s “easier” for either the doctor or the mother than going through labor. It especially makes no sense to me, as recovery times for C-sections are significantly longer and more painful than for natural childbirths.
C-Sections, although having a low mortality rate, are just not as safe as having a child naturally.
But, no one should be looked down upon because they wanted an epidural.
No woman should feel guilty, “less of a woman,” or grief because she had to have a necessary C-section instead of natural childbirth. And other women shouldn’t necessarily feel superior for having a natural childbirth, either. Neither one makes you a better or worse mother.
I think that we perform too many medically unnecessary C-sections in the US.
Yet at the same time, we cannot forget that dying during childbirth was not uncommon all that long ago.
I think there is a distinct lack of true dialogue between mothers-to-be and their healthcare providers. I don’t know if it can be traced to a bottom-line driven healthcare system, lack of knowledge, malpractice fears, or what. But either doctors need to listen more, or women have to be more aggressive in questioning their doctors.
Or, better yet, how about both of those?
And yes, this is coming from a woman who had a scheduled, medically necessary C-section.















