Monday Teeny Poll: In the Doghouse » Teeny Manolo






Monday Teeny Poll: In the Doghouse

By Glinda

Photobucket

I asked you last week what you thought about Angelina Jolie’s W Magazine cover, and you overwhelmingly supported it with a positive vote of 91%. I agree. We have become so accustomed to the sexualization of breasts that we forget their real purpose. There is nothing inappropriate, there is nothing shocking. Just a beautiful picture of a beautiful woman nursing what is probably a beautiful baby.

This week we are going to discuss a dad. I love dads. I think they’re great.

But this dad? I’m not sure. The Tennessee resident decided to go against his wife’s wishes of naming their newborn Ava Grace and instead filled out the birth certificate with the name “Sarah McCain Palin.” Probably while the mom was sleeping, because according to the article, she didn’t believe that her husband really did that. But he did, seeing it as his way to support his chosen cause since he doesn’t have a lot of money to donate.









6 Responses to “Monday Teeny Poll: In the Doghouse”




  1. La Petite Acadienne Says:

    The political aspect of it would have been irrelevant IF both parents had agreed to that name.

    It’s the fact that he went behind his wife’s back, right after she went through labour and childbirth, and he had absolutely NO regard for her wishes or consideration for whether that name may cause his daughter grief down the road.

    As an acquaintance said, “My wife is a vet. If I did that, I’d wake up one day to find myself neutered.”

    It also slays me that he considers this a way to support his chosen candidate. Yeah, nice sacrifice YOU made there, buddy, by foisting that name on your daughter.




  2. J Says:

    I only have one argument with your lovely post (I voted!)…when it comes to the “true purpose”…um, if it were only food for the young, why would it be so pleasurable for both parties? I’m guessing they’re sort of double purpose wonders. ;)




  3. raincoaster Says:

    The true political issue is that the person who did NOT give birth to the child is asserting naming rights over the child. Let me raise all KINDS of scary issues with this but, if the kid didn’t come out of your uterus and you’re not willing to pay for a DNA analysis, you don’t get naming rights.




  4. raincoaster Says:

    Dear god, I even work here and my comments get sent to Spam! It’s some kind of anti-communist cabal, I tell ya!




  5. Jennie Says:

    Ms. raincoaster, that’s why I gave up on commenting on MftBG. Sigh..Read and go, Read and go…




  6. raincoaster Says:

    They had a big problem, but I think it’s fixed now.




Leave a Reply










Disclaimer: Manolo the Shoeblogger is not Manolo Blahnik
Copyright © 2007; Manolo the Shoeblogger, All Rights Reserved



  • Recent Comments:






  • Teeny Manolo is powered by WordPress

    Disclaimer: Manolo the Shoeblogger is not Manolo Blahnik








    Subscribe!


    Co-Editors

    raincoaster
    Glinda

    Publisher

    Manolo the Shoeblogger






    Glam Ad

    Categories