<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Pushing Really for Suckers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/</link>
	<description>Celebrating the Joys of Parenting and Childhood</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20497</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20497</guid>
		<description>I had planned to have my daughter naturally. No drugs, no c-section. However, my daughter wasn't descending properly and was having some erratic vital signs. The doctor's gave me an option to try pushing for a bit longer or to have a c-section. For me there wasn't even a question I said start prepping me for the c-section. For number two, I'm pretty sure that I would have a scheduled c-section. 

As an older first time mom and being a breech baby myself I'd pretty much come into the pregnancy with the attitude that 'Hey, I'll try the natural childbirth thing but my main goal is a healthy baby.' So I was pretty much ok with either outcome. The thing I had really wanted to avoid was the epidural needle and I ended up with a spinal anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had planned to have my daughter naturally. No drugs, no c-section. However, my daughter wasn&#8217;t descending properly and was having some erratic vital signs. The doctor&#8217;s gave me an option to try pushing for a bit longer or to have a c-section. For me there wasn&#8217;t even a question I said start prepping me for the c-section. For number two, I&#8217;m pretty sure that I would have a scheduled c-section. </p>
<p>As an older first time mom and being a breech baby myself I&#8217;d pretty much come into the pregnancy with the attitude that &#8216;Hey, I&#8217;ll try the natural childbirth thing but my main goal is a healthy baby.&#8217; So I was pretty much ok with either outcome. The thing I had really wanted to avoid was the epidural needle and I ended up with a spinal anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvel</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20394</link>
		<dc:creator>marvel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20394</guid>
		<description>Dr Nic,

Congratulations on your baby girl! 

I wonder if OB practice patterns are different in private vs academic? All the academic OBs I've worked with would not deliver at 38 wks, as that is not technically full term. In fact none of them would induce a normal healthy pregnancy before the mom was post-dates (42 wks). And no OB would schedule a C/S "just for convenience" if a mom didn't have to undergo a C/S or wanted to try a VBAC.  Scheduling C/S is a different story if it's a second or later pregnancy and the first delivery was a C/S. If the mom HAS to have a C/S (which, if you've already had 2 or more C/S, you'll continue to have C/S, as no OB would allow an attempted VBAC, as risk of uterine rupture is too high). If you have to have a C/S anyway because of medical history, I don't see why not schedule for convenience, during week 39 or later.

There _is_ a flurry of C/S scheduled the last week of December--expectant moms trying to get the baby out before the next calendar year--but those are all women who have to have C/S for medical reasons anyway.

Bellamomma and class-factotum, can you imagine the guilt a mom would carry if she chose a home-birth and things went wrong and her child was injured for life? I can't imagine taking that risk.

The best model I've seen for allowing women a full range of choices and safety for childbirth was in one of the Boston hospitals, where the OBs partnered with area midwives. Women with normal healthy pregnancies could have a midwife-attended, natural childbirth in a private hospital suite (I think with the bathtubs and everything). If anything went wrong, medical attention was immediately available. It was a great model, though difficult to duplicate because OBs and midwives don't always get along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Nic,</p>
<p>Congratulations on your baby girl! </p>
<p>I wonder if OB practice patterns are different in private vs academic? All the academic OBs I&#8217;ve worked with would not deliver at 38 wks, as that is not technically full term. In fact none of them would induce a normal healthy pregnancy before the mom was post-dates (42 wks). And no OB would schedule a C/S &#8220;just for convenience&#8221; if a mom didn&#8217;t have to undergo a C/S or wanted to try a VBAC.  Scheduling C/S is a different story if it&#8217;s a second or later pregnancy and the first delivery was a C/S. If the mom HAS to have a C/S (which, if you&#8217;ve already had 2 or more C/S, you&#8217;ll continue to have C/S, as no OB would allow an attempted VBAC, as risk of uterine rupture is too high). If you have to have a C/S anyway because of medical history, I don&#8217;t see why not schedule for convenience, during week 39 or later.</p>
<p>There _is_ a flurry of C/S scheduled the last week of December&#8211;expectant moms trying to get the baby out before the next calendar year&#8211;but those are all women who have to have C/S for medical reasons anyway.</p>
<p>Bellamomma and class-factotum, can you imagine the guilt a mom would carry if she chose a home-birth and things went wrong and her child was injured for life? I can&#8217;t imagine taking that risk.</p>
<p>The best model I&#8217;ve seen for allowing women a full range of choices and safety for childbirth was in one of the Boston hospitals, where the OBs partnered with area midwives. Women with normal healthy pregnancies could have a midwife-attended, natural childbirth in a private hospital suite (I think with the bathtubs and everything). If anything went wrong, medical attention was immediately available. It was a great model, though difficult to duplicate because OBs and midwives don&#8217;t always get along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class-factotum</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20367</link>
		<dc:creator>class-factotum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20367</guid>
		<description>Bellamama, a childbirth professional (and I use that term lightly) who knows all the horrible things that can go wrong at the last minute wanted to have her baby at home? Even if you aren't worried that the cord will wrap itself around the baby's neck and need expert intervention, why would you want that mess on your own sheets?

I think the "against her husband's wishes" is also a key part of this woman's psychology, along with her refusal to call 911 when HER BABY'S LIFE WAS AT RISK.

I'm with you. My motto is no pain, no pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bellamama, a childbirth professional (and I use that term lightly) who knows all the horrible things that can go wrong at the last minute wanted to have her baby at home? Even if you aren&#8217;t worried that the cord will wrap itself around the baby&#8217;s neck and need expert intervention, why would you want that mess on your own sheets?</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;against her husband&#8217;s wishes&#8221; is also a key part of this woman&#8217;s psychology, along with her refusal to call 911 when HER BABY&#8217;S LIFE WAS AT RISK.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you. My motto is no pain, no pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr nic</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20348</link>
		<dc:creator>dr nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20348</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone who is currently recovering from a c-section (on Tuesday), I don't understand why anyone would plan this intentionally.  I tried induction for a vaginal deliver and made absolutely no progress in over 8 hrs so they decided to do a c-section while we were all doing well.  As it turned out , my darling little girl has the shoulders of a linebacker and would likely have been difficult to deliver vaginally anyway.  But for now, it hurts to stand, walk, get in and out of bed, and I can't really do anything but sit with my feet up.   Would I have another c-section?  I'm not sure.

I think that there are too many doctors who are willing to do things like induce at 38 weeks because the mom doesn't want to be pregnant any more (which is likely to fail and lead to c-section) or do a c-section just for convenience sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone who is currently recovering from a c-section (on Tuesday), I don&#8217;t understand why anyone would plan this intentionally.  I tried induction for a vaginal deliver and made absolutely no progress in over 8 hrs so they decided to do a c-section while we were all doing well.  As it turned out , my darling little girl has the shoulders of a linebacker and would likely have been difficult to deliver vaginally anyway.  But for now, it hurts to stand, walk, get in and out of bed, and I can&#8217;t really do anything but sit with my feet up.   Would I have another c-section?  I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>I think that there are too many doctors who are willing to do things like induce at 38 weeks because the mom doesn&#8217;t want to be pregnant any more (which is likely to fail and lead to c-section) or do a c-section just for convenience sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellamama</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20343</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellamama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20343</guid>
		<description>Apparently she felt that the pain was all part of the wonderful experience. 

She kept telling the husbands "women look forward to childbirth. We've planned and looked forward to the experience since we were little girls. I gave birth to both my children at home, against my husband's wishes, and it was everything I hoped for!"

I just kept thinking, "I planned and looked forward to my wedding since I was a girl. The only plan I had for childbirth was to avoid the pain as much as possible!"

She also admitted that she almost lost her first baby because they were not in a hospital, and her husband wanted to call 911, but she held her ground and it all ended up okay. I'm sorry, but I just don't understand why anyone would WANT that kind of experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently she felt that the pain was all part of the wonderful experience. </p>
<p>She kept telling the husbands &#8220;women look forward to childbirth. We&#8217;ve planned and looked forward to the experience since we were little girls. I gave birth to both my children at home, against my husband&#8217;s wishes, and it was everything I hoped for!&#8221;</p>
<p>I just kept thinking, &#8220;I planned and looked forward to my wedding since I was a girl. The only plan I had for childbirth was to avoid the pain as much as possible!&#8221;</p>
<p>She also admitted that she almost lost her first baby because they were not in a hospital, and her husband wanted to call 911, but she held her ground and it all ended up okay. I&#8217;m sorry, but I just don&#8217;t understand why anyone would WANT that kind of experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class-factotum</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20329</link>
		<dc:creator>class-factotum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20329</guid>
		<description>"The teacher went on and on about how 'women have been giving birth naturally since the beginning of time'"

Did she mention the part of how women have been dying in childbirth since the beginning of time, too? Or, at the least, been in a lot of pain? Maybe she really believes that labor pains are our punishment for Eve's transgressions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The teacher went on and on about how &#8216;women have been giving birth naturally since the beginning of time&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Did she mention the part of how women have been dying in childbirth since the beginning of time, too? Or, at the least, been in a lot of pain? Maybe she really believes that labor pains are our punishment for Eve&#8217;s transgressions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemdiva</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20306</link>
		<dc:creator>gemdiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 03:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20306</guid>
		<description>When my son and daughter-in-law had their first child, my son asked me if I wanted to be in the delivery room during the birth.  I said "Honey, I didn't even want to be in the delivery room when you were born."  So yeah, I went for the drugs and I also ended up needing a c-section, after 12 hours of induced labor produced no movement on my son's part.  He clearly wasn't sticking to his end of the bargain.  The recovery was a b**ch.

I can remember hearing of another learned study back then, 30+ years ago, saying too many c-sections were being performed unnecessarily, and that researchers had found a potential link to kidney disease later in life for children born via c-section.  

BTW, I did end up in the delivery room when my grandchildwas born, and child birth definitely improves as a spectator sport.  And once you get beyond the "I can't believe what I'm looking at" phase and get to the "oh my God, that's the most perfect child I've ever seen" phase, it's a highly moving experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When my son and daughter-in-law had their first child, my son asked me if I wanted to be in the delivery room during the birth.  I said &#8220;Honey, I didn&#8217;t even want to be in the delivery room when you were born.&#8221;  So yeah, I went for the drugs and I also ended up needing a c-section, after 12 hours of induced labor produced no movement on my son&#8217;s part.  He clearly wasn&#8217;t sticking to his end of the bargain.  The recovery was a b**ch.</p>
<p>I can remember hearing of another learned study back then, 30+ years ago, saying too many c-sections were being performed unnecessarily, and that researchers had found a potential link to kidney disease later in life for children born via c-section.  </p>
<p>BTW, I did end up in the delivery room when my grandchildwas born, and child birth definitely improves as a spectator sport.  And once you get beyond the &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe what I&#8217;m looking at&#8221; phase and get to the &#8220;oh my God, that&#8217;s the most perfect child I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8221; phase, it&#8217;s a highly moving experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellamama</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20289</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellamama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20289</guid>
		<description>I took a class when we were preparing for our little guy to get us ready for labor. The teacher went on and on about how "women have been giving birth naturally since the beginning of time" and it's the way things ought to be. I heard "You can do it. Every woman can do it. Just tell yourself you can and you will."

The teacher took a poll at the end of the last session, asking who would be brave enough to push through natural childbirth and who would wuss out and have medication. Everyone in the room, but me, agreed (very nervously) to get through their labors unassisted. I raised my hand fearlessly and said "epidural all the way!"

Well, I ended up having to be induced and I got my epidural, but I ended up letting the epidural stop because the nurses said it would slow down the pushing. Well, ladies, I pushed through two hours of medicine free labor. By the end of it I knew why some women have planned c-sections. I was so bitter about the experience, I wouldn't look at my baby for days. I feel differently now and I don't think I would do a planned c-section. I would just keep the epidural going!

However, honestly, it's your own body and if you would rather be cut open then tear open, don't let anyone try to tell you you're wrong! It's your body, your baby, and it should be between you and your doctor. The only thing I feel really strongly about here is that I DON'T like people, like my child-prep teacher, pushing their agenda on first-time moms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took a class when we were preparing for our little guy to get us ready for labor. The teacher went on and on about how &#8220;women have been giving birth naturally since the beginning of time&#8221; and it&#8217;s the way things ought to be. I heard &#8220;You can do it. Every woman can do it. Just tell yourself you can and you will.&#8221;</p>
<p>The teacher took a poll at the end of the last session, asking who would be brave enough to push through natural childbirth and who would wuss out and have medication. Everyone in the room, but me, agreed (very nervously) to get through their labors unassisted. I raised my hand fearlessly and said &#8220;epidural all the way!&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I ended up having to be induced and I got my epidural, but I ended up letting the epidural stop because the nurses said it would slow down the pushing. Well, ladies, I pushed through two hours of medicine free labor. By the end of it I knew why some women have planned c-sections. I was so bitter about the experience, I wouldn&#8217;t look at my baby for days. I feel differently now and I don&#8217;t think I would do a planned c-section. I would just keep the epidural going!</p>
<p>However, honestly, it&#8217;s your own body and if you would rather be cut open then tear open, don&#8217;t let anyone try to tell you you&#8217;re wrong! It&#8217;s your body, your baby, and it should be between you and your doctor. The only thing I feel really strongly about here is that I DON&#8217;T like people, like my child-prep teacher, pushing their agenda on first-time moms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class-factotum</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20279</link>
		<dc:creator>class-factotum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20279</guid>
		<description>I don't have any children, so I don't have a dog in this fight,  but of course I still have an opinion, which is that as long as you end up with a baby, who cares? 

If I ever had a baby, I would ask to be knocked out because I've had menstrual cramps that have made me pass out, so why would I want to have even worse pain in labor? 

And amen to the statement that women used to die in labor. The corollary to that is that children used to die from diptheria and whooping cough (my great-something grandmother lost all six of her children in seven days to diptheria, then had more kids), which is why we vaccinate now. The same women who want to have their babies at home in the bathtub because "it's so safe! what could go wrong?" are probably the same ones who think vaccinating is a bad idea. 

Sorry. I got off track there. I just get so annoyed with people who ignore the role of modern medicine in maternal and child health and want to be "natural," when it's nature, and not medicine, that has tried to kill them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have any children, so I don&#8217;t have a dog in this fight,  but of course I still have an opinion, which is that as long as you end up with a baby, who cares? </p>
<p>If I ever had a baby, I would ask to be knocked out because I&#8217;ve had menstrual cramps that have made me pass out, so why would I want to have even worse pain in labor? </p>
<p>And amen to the statement that women used to die in labor. The corollary to that is that children used to die from diptheria and whooping cough (my great-something grandmother lost all six of her children in seven days to diptheria, then had more kids), which is why we vaccinate now. The same women who want to have their babies at home in the bathtub because &#8220;it&#8217;s so safe! what could go wrong?&#8221; are probably the same ones who think vaccinating is a bad idea. </p>
<p>Sorry. I got off track there. I just get so annoyed with people who ignore the role of modern medicine in maternal and child health and want to be &#8220;natural,&#8221; when it&#8217;s nature, and not medicine, that has tried to kill them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marvel</title>
		<link>http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20186</link>
		<dc:creator>marvel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teenymanolo.com/2008/08/07/is-pushing-really-for-suckers/#comment-20186</guid>
		<description>No decent physician will unnecessarily risk the life of mother or baby with a difficult delivery when a C/S will grant both healthy moms and babies. OBs convert from vaginal deliveries to C/S to prevent immediate harm to mom or baby. (always easier to ensure a good outcome, from a doctor's perspective, by controlling the events, and C/S are much more controllable than vaginal deliveries).

Unfortunately, at a population level, I think also that there are too many C/S due to fear of malpractice lawsuits. 

One of the most interesting ethical/technological/medical discussions I've heard was a lecture about how those little scalp baby heart monitors altered OB/Gyn practice in the 1980s. Although advertised as enabling OBs to monitor the health of the baby during vaginal delivery, there was very little evidence at the time backing up the appropriate interpretation of the baby's heart rate. There was also a widespread belief--though never proved, and is highly debatable--that cerebral palsy was due to birth trauma during vaginal delivery. Sometimes it might be, but often no one really knows. ALL to say, there was a flurry of high-priced lawsuits against OBs when moms went through difficult vaginal deliveries, the OB was accused of improperly interpreting the baby scalp heart monitor (though remember, there were NO "gold-standard" studies established guidelines for such interpretations) and the baby came out with cerebral palsy. Result: OBs are quick to stop a vaginal delivery and convert to C/S, because they a) don't want to risk hurting the mom or baby and b) they don't want to get sued if the baby comes out with a problem.

An interesting history of the judicial and medical issues surrounding those heart monitors can be found in this article:

http://www.warriorsfortruth.com/john-edwards-vice-president.html

(I do NOT include this in any way, shape or form as a comment on John Edwards or politics or elections or anything. It's just his history in the legal profession and the cases he won for his clients are highly publicized and good examples of the 1980s lawsuits that have now led to increased C/S rates.)

On a more personal note, I think the whole C/S vs vaginal delivery thing is sort of like the whole formula vs. breast-feeding thing. If you're blessed enough that everything goes well, do it naturally. But if things aren't working, there's no shame in taking advantage of medical and social progress TO SURVIVE.  Check out the graphs here:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4838a2.htm#fig1

I'm so glad we live in a time when we expect--no, demand-- that all moms and babies live through childbirth. It's such a gift, even it it comes with C/S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No decent physician will unnecessarily risk the life of mother or baby with a difficult delivery when a C/S will grant both healthy moms and babies. OBs convert from vaginal deliveries to C/S to prevent immediate harm to mom or baby. (always easier to ensure a good outcome, from a doctor&#8217;s perspective, by controlling the events, and C/S are much more controllable than vaginal deliveries).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, at a population level, I think also that there are too many C/S due to fear of malpractice lawsuits. </p>
<p>One of the most interesting ethical/technological/medical discussions I&#8217;ve heard was a lecture about how those little scalp baby heart monitors altered OB/Gyn practice in the 1980s. Although advertised as enabling OBs to monitor the health of the baby during vaginal delivery, there was very little evidence at the time backing up the appropriate interpretation of the baby&#8217;s heart rate. There was also a widespread belief&#8211;though never proved, and is highly debatable&#8211;that cerebral palsy was due to birth trauma during vaginal delivery. Sometimes it might be, but often no one really knows. ALL to say, there was a flurry of high-priced lawsuits against OBs when moms went through difficult vaginal deliveries, the OB was accused of improperly interpreting the baby scalp heart monitor (though remember, there were NO &#8220;gold-standard&#8221; studies established guidelines for such interpretations) and the baby came out with cerebral palsy. Result: OBs are quick to stop a vaginal delivery and convert to C/S, because they a) don&#8217;t want to risk hurting the mom or baby and b) they don&#8217;t want to get sued if the baby comes out with a problem.</p>
<p>An interesting history of the judicial and medical issues surrounding those heart monitors can be found in this article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.warriorsfortruth.com/john-edwards-vice-president.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.warriorsfortruth.com/john-edwards-vice-president.html</a></p>
<p>(I do NOT include this in any way, shape or form as a comment on John Edwards or politics or elections or anything. It&#8217;s just his history in the legal profession and the cases he won for his clients are highly publicized and good examples of the 1980s lawsuits that have now led to increased C/S rates.)</p>
<p>On a more personal note, I think the whole C/S vs vaginal delivery thing is sort of like the whole formula vs. breast-feeding thing. If you&#8217;re blessed enough that everything goes well, do it naturally. But if things aren&#8217;t working, there&#8217;s no shame in taking advantage of medical and social progress TO SURVIVE.  Check out the graphs here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4838a2.htm#fig1" rel="nofollow">http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4838a2.htm#fig1</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad we live in a time when we expect&#8211;no, demand&#8211; that all moms and babies live through childbirth. It&#8217;s such a gift, even it it comes with C/S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
